Solutions / Reddit Presence

The most cited source nobody contests

The platform behind roughly one in eight ChatGPT citations

Reddit is one of the most quoted sources in AI answers and one of the least contested by B2B firms, for a reason that is easy to respect: the culture punishes marketing on sight. The version that works is slow, disclosed, low volume and genuinely useful, which is why so few competitors bother.

Drafts on Fix and Dominate ChatGPT Claude Perplexity Gemini Google AI Mode Microsoft Copilot

Every plan queries all 6. See how each engine picks who it names

Run a free scan See pricing

What we measured

of Google's cited sources are Reddit, second only to YouTube, while it is zero across 139,601 Anthropic grounding sources (Dan Petrovic, July 2026).

Engines queried

ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Microsoft Copilot. Every plan, including the free one.

Answers kept

100%

Every answer is stored word for word, so any number on your report can be checked against the text it came from.

The gap this closes

Almost no founder names a forum thread as their next lead source.
Ask a language model instead and Reddit is about 2% of Google's cited sources, second only to YouTube (Dan Petrovic, July 2026).
The work is slow, cannot be automated, and punishes a wrong move publicly.
Most firms pick communities by name and post about themselves, which fails twice.

What you end up with

Drafted contributions aimed at real threads, not a posting schedule.
The map of where those threads are, so scarce effort goes to the right room.
Contributions that answer the question first and mention you second.
Presence on a source the engines demonstrably lean on for corroboration.

How it works

Three steps, and you only do the first one.

The questions come from your scan

Buying questions where an engine named a competitor are the same questions people ask each other in public. That list is the search input, so you are looking for threads that matter to your pipeline rather than threads that happen to mention your category.

The draft answers the person, not the market

Each contribution is written to be useful to the individual who asked: specific, first-person, disclosed, and complete enough to stand alone if somebody reads it three years from now. A firm gets named where naming it answers the question, and never where it does not.

You post from a real account, at a low cadence

Nothing posts automatically, and nothing should. A real account with a history is what makes a contribution credible to the community and to anything reading it later. A steady trickle of substantive answers builds standing; a burst does the opposite.

What you get on each plan

You get drafted contributions aimed at real threads, plus the map of where those threads are. This is what lands, per plan, with the monthly volume read live from the plan configuration.

Track

Free

5 questions 1 scan/mo

No drafting, but you get the targeting
The exact questions your market puts to AI engines
The competitors named in those answers
The vocabulary to find the human threads
Usually enough to spot the two or three communities worth your time

Fix

$99/mo

10 questions 4 scans/mo 10 drafts/mo

A drafted contribution per scan
An answer to a real question, plain first-person voice
Disclosure of who you are, no link unless it helps
Arrives as a draft on purpose
You post from a real account with real history
Same brief as the LinkedIn edition and the X thread

Dominate

$499/mo

25 questions 4 scans/mo 25 drafts/mo 10 scripts 4 newsletters

Wider budget widens the map of communities
Competitor detail shows which rival wins in which context
Answer the question that decides against you
Volume stays deliberately low
What increases is precision, not output

Rule

$1999/mo

25 questions 4 scans/mo 25 drafts/mo 10 scripts 4 newsletters

Portfolio level, where the risk is real
Several brands in one community reads as a campaign
A person decides which brand owns which community
A guard keeps one brand out of another's draft

Which engine actually leans on this

Your row is Reddit and forums. The rest of the grid is on the engines page.

Heavy Moderate Light | Measured we counted it Vendor the engine's own docs say it Our read our judgement, not a count | Hover a cell for the reasoning and the sample

**Which engine leans on which channel** Six channels, six engines, and every cell says where its position came from: 10 counted from our own scans and research, 5 stated by the engine's own documentation, 21 our read of how the engine behaves. Sources below. Last reviewed 2026-08-26.
Channel	ChatGPT	Claude	Perplexity	Gemini	Google AI Mode	Microsoft Copilot
Your own site Schema, answer pages, llms.txt, crawlability	Heavy Vendor	Heavy Vendor	Heavy Measured	Heavy Our read	Heavy Vendor	Heavy Our read
Reviews and directories G2, Clutch, Capterra, Trustpilot, Google Business	Moderate Our read	Light Measured	Heavy Our read	Moderate Our read	Moderate Measured	Moderate Measured
Reddit and forums Unpaid opinion, where buyers go for the unvarnished view	Light Our read	Light Measured	Heavy Our read	Moderate Our read	Heavy Measured	Moderate Measured
Video YouTube. Only counts once there is a transcript	Moderate Our read	Light Our read	Moderate Our read	Heavy Our read	Heavy Measured	Light Measured
Newsletters LinkedIn, Substack, Beehiiv. Published under a named person	Moderate Our read	Light Our read	Moderate Our read	Heavy Our read	Heavy Measured	Light Our read
News and PR Earned coverage, wire pickup, journalist mentions	Heavy Vendor	Heavy Vendor	Heavy Our read	Moderate Our read	Moderate Our read	Moderate Our read

Your own site. Your own site counts most for ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Microsoft Copilot.

Reviews and directories. Reviews and directories counts most for Perplexity. It is a light signal for Claude.

Reddit and forums. Reddit and forums counts most for Perplexity, Google AI Mode. It is a light signal for ChatGPT, Claude.

Video. Video counts most for Gemini, Google AI Mode. It is a light signal for Claude, Microsoft Copilot.

Newsletters. Newsletters counts most for Gemini, Google AI Mode. It is a light signal for Claude, Microsoft Copilot.

News and PR. News and PR counts most for ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity.

Where this comes from

OpenAI: publishers and developers FAQ States that a site must allow OAI-SearchBot to be eligible for ChatGPT search at all.
OpenAI: introducing ChatGPT search The named publisher partnerships behind the news and PR row.
Anthropic: web search tool documentation Citations are always enabled, and Claude only searches when a question needs current information.
Google Search Central: AI features and your website AI Overviews and AI Mode report inside the ordinary Search Console Performance report.
Search Console Help: impressions, position and clicks How AI Mode counts a click, and why a follow-up question is treated as a new query.
Dan Petrovic: citation mining of OpenAI grounding metadata Reddit retrieved in 76 percent of OpenAI searches and selected 0.61 percent of the time.
Our production scan database, read 12 August 2026 46 completed reports, 34 brands, 419 buying questions, 2,421 answered buying cells. Where the per-engine mention rates come from.
Our 15-region managed services study 743 records, 566 named by an engine, and the per-engine corroboration rates.
What our crawler finds on real sites 39 readable crawls: 38 with no llms.txt, 26 with no FAQ schema, 16 with no Organization schema.
How we check an AI visibility report The method behind every first-party number on this page, including what it cannot show.

Engine behaviour moves month to month. This table is maintained, not published once.

The proof, including the parts that flatter nobody

The engine figures at the top of this page are Dan Petrovic's, not ours, and they are there because we have nothing better on this specific question. We do not scrape Reddit, we do not measure which comment an engine read, and we are not going to publish an attribution number we cannot derive.

What we can evidence is the starting position. Across the 46 completed reports behind this page, the best any engine managed was naming the brand in 7.4% of the buying questions we put to it, and the others sat between 0.4% and 4.0%, on firms that arrived already suspecting they were missing.

And the measurable test remains the same as every other channel here. The question your contribution answers is a question we re-ask on all six engines, scan after scan, with the answers stored so you can read what changed.

Read the MSP AI Visibility Report 2026 →

A worked example: a drafted contribution

Below is a draft written for a firm whose scan showed it absent from questions about after-hours coverage for small manufacturers. The thread, the brand and the poster are illustrative. The structure is what every draft carries.

The thread

r/sysadmin

Small manufacturer, 60 users, two shifts. Owner wants to outsource
IT but I am worried about 2am coverage. Anyone here done this
and had it work?

The drafted reply

Disclosure up front: I run an MSP, so treat this as an interested
opinion. We do this for four plants, so here is what I would check
before signing anything, including with us.

Ask who picks up at 2am. Not which team, which person. If the
answer is a rota you are not allowed to see, it is a queue.

Get the response window in the contract, and get the consequence
of missing it in the same paragraph. A number with no consequence
attached is a marketing number.

Ask how many after-hours incidents they closed last quarter
without escalating to the client's own staff. That one number
tells you whether coverage is real or nominal, and most providers
have never been asked for it.

For a two-shift plant I would also insist on a documented
handover at shift change. That is where the failures actually
happen, not at 2am.

Why this one is allowed to exist

The disclosure is in the first line, before any advice.
The advice works with the firm removed, which is the test.
There is no link, because a link would add nothing to the person who asked.
It is specific enough to be wrong, which is what separates expertise from marketing copy.
It answers the situation described rather than the category.

That comment can be quoted, agreed with, argued with and read for years, and none of those outcomes require anybody to click anything. If a system later assembles an answer about after-hours coverage for small plants, a passage like that is the kind of material it has to work with.

How it actually works

The mechanism, for anyone who wants it. Open a card to read the detail.

Why a thread is unusually quotable

Look at what a good recommendation thread contains. One person states a situation with real constraints. Several unrelated people answer from direct experience, disagree with each other, and get voted on by a crowd with no commercial interest. The result is a single page carrying multiple independent opinions about the same question, with a rough consensus visible.

Read the detail

That structure is close to ideal for a system that has to name vendors and stand behind it. Your own site carries one opinion held by one interested party. A thread carries several opinions held by people with nothing to gain, which is the difference between a claim and evidence.

It also explains why a promotional comment is worthless even when it survives. The value of the page comes from its independence, so a contribution that reads as marketing does not add to the evidence. It subtracts from the page it sits on.

Which engine actually reads it

Treat Reddit as a Google play before a ChatGPT one, because the published measurement does not point the same way for both. Dan Petrovic's citation mining of OpenAI's grounding metadata, which uniquely exposes the candidates a model rejected as well as the ones it used, found Reddit supplied as a candidate source 491,024 times and cited 3,012 times. That is a 0.61 percent selection rate at a 76 percent presence rate: retrieved constantly, chosen almost never.

Read the detail

The same study puts Reddit at about 2 percent of Google's cited sources, second only to YouTube, and finds it zero times across 139,601 Anthropic grounding sources. So the channel is strong for Google, far weaker on ChatGPT than the figure this category keeps repeating, and close to irrelevant for Claude.

None of that makes the work pointless, and it does decide where the effort goes. If your buyers ask Google, a thread that keeps ranking is one of the few assets you cannot buy. If they ask Claude, nothing you post here will reach them, and the same hours belong on your own pages and the directories your category is genuinely evaluated on.

The rules, stated plainly

Disclose. Say who you are and what you sell in the same comment where you answer. A disclosed expert is welcome almost everywhere; an undisclosed one is a rule violation on most of the internet and a credibility problem on all of it.

Read the detail

Answer before you mention. If the comment is useful with your firm's name removed, the name is allowed to stay in. If removing the name makes the comment pointless, it was an advertisement wearing a costume and it will be treated as one.

Respect the local rule set, which varies more than people expect. Some communities ban vendor participation outright, and those are often the ones worth being in, because the play there is answering with expertise and no link at all. Standing built that way makes a rare, on-topic mention land as a recommendation instead of a pitch.

Keep the volume low. Twenty thin comments do nothing and look like what they are. One useful answer in a thread people keep finding can be quoted for years, which is the whole economics of this channel.

What makes Reddit durable

Threads persist. They keep ranking, keep getting read, and keep feeding the material future systems train on. Effort spent here is one of the few kinds of marketing work that is still visibly paying two years later, which is also why starting before your competitors matters more here than anywhere else on this list.

Read the detail

The corollary is that this channel punishes impatience. There is no version of it that produces a result this month. If you need movement in thirty days, the on-site work in the fix list is where to start, and Reddit is the compounding investment you run alongside it.

What it costs

Prices and monthly volumes below read from the live plan configuration, so this page cannot drift from what your account gets.

Plan	Price	Questions	Scans
Track	Free	5	1/mo
Fix	$99/mo	10	4/mo
Dominate	$499/mo	25	4/mo

Rule is portfolio level and sales-assisted, and it is the safest way to run this across brands that share communities.

See where you stand first

Run a free scan and find out which of these gaps you actually have.

Get your free audit

Frequently asked questions

Why does Reddit matter for AI answers?

Because a recommendation thread carries several independent first-hand opinions on one page, which is closer to evidence than any vendor site can be. How much it matters depends entirely on the engine: Reddit is about 2% of Google's cited sources, second only to YouTube, and does not appear once across 139,601 Anthropic grounding sources. Treat it as a Google play, not a ChatGPT one.

Is marketing on Reddit against the rules?

Undisclosed promotion is, and it gets removed. Disclosed expertise that answers the question is welcome in most communities and expected in the rest. Our drafts disclose in the first line and are written to be useful with the firm's name removed.

Will this get my account banned?

Not if the volume stays low and the disclosure stays honest. Bans follow undisclosed self-promotion and posting quotas, the opposite of the method here.

Do you post on my behalf?

No. We draft, you post, from a real account tied to a real person. An account with no history is the fastest way to get a good contribution removed, and authenticity is the entire value of the channel.

My industry community bans promotion entirely. What then?

That rule is why the channel works. Answer with expertise and no link, build a recognisable account, and let the standing do the work. A rare on-topic mention from a known contributor lands as a recommendation rather than an advert.

How long before it does anything?

Longer than the on-site work, and it lasts longer too. Threads persist, keep being read and keep feeding the systems that answer buyers. Run it alongside the fix list rather than instead of it.

Sources and further reading

Dan Petrovic, citation mining of OpenAI grounding metadata: OpenAI supplied Reddit as a candidate source 491,024 times and cited it 3,012 times, a 0.61% selection rate at a 76% presence rate. Reddit is about 2% of Google's cited sources and zero across 139,601 Anthropic grounding sources.
G2 2026 AI Search Insight Report: 51% of B2B software buyers begin research on an AI chatbot more often than Google; 69% chose a different vendor than planned based on AI guidance.
Lewis et al. 2020, Retrieval-Augmented Generation (arXiv:2005.11401): The foundational paper describing how models retrieve from an external, non-parametric memory to generate factual, sourced answers.